Difference between revisions of "Talk:Composing"

From Fallen Sword Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Leveling with the least amount of commons)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 53: Line 53:
 
|120
 
|120
 
|30 (confirmed)
 
|30 (confirmed)
 +
|-
 +
|1
 +
|60
 +
|60
 +
|20 (retry)
 
|}
 
|}
 +
 +
270mins, 270skill points = 60XP (retry)
  
 
'''possible formulas:'''
 
'''possible formulas:'''
Line 61: Line 68:
  
  
As Hoof stated in the forums (http://forums.huntedcow.com/index.php?showtopic=58448&page=10#entry810636)
+
'''As Hoof stated in the forums''' (http://forums.huntedcow.com/index.php?showtopic=58448&page=10#entry810636)
 +
*composingXPGained = ceil((durationFactor / 60) + (totalPotionSkillLevel / 500)) * 10
 +
 
 +
 
 +
ojo1 understood it like this
 +
*http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=ceil%28%28DURATION+%2F+60%29+%2B+%28+TOTAL+SKILL+LEVEL%2F+500%29%29+*+10 , just replace "DURATION" for the duration of the pot (30, 60, 120, etc.) and "TOTAL SKILL LEVEL" for the total of the skills level
 +
**note if the DURATION is bigger than TOTAL SKILL LEVEL, use the same number from TOTAL SKILL LEVEL for the DURATION
 +
 
 +
 
 +
That's correct, ojo1. The updated formula should look like this:
 +
*composingXPGained = ceil((min(durationFactor, totalPotionSkillLevel) / 60) + (totalPotionSkillLevel / 500)) * 10
 +
 
 +
--[[User:Majere|Majere]] 16:15 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
== Leveling with the least amount of commons ==
 +
 
 +
This is my first ever time controubiuting in any way to any form of wiki-
 +
If the forulma fo getting the optioum XP for the leaset amount of fragments were to be updated to use a base of 50 instead of a base of 40 it would save a lot of people a lot of fragments and be a little more accurate to it's name.
  
The Composing XP you gain is worked out as follows:
+
For example :A potition brewed with 4 level 50 skill and 1 level 68 skill for 160 common and 10 rare to get 60 XP
   
+
The one on the guide proposes 4 level 40 and 1 level 108 for 126 common and 27 rare to get 60
durationFactor = potionDuration;
+
if(durationFactor > totalPotionSkillLevel)
+
durationFactor = totalPotionSkillLevel
+
  
composingXPGained = ceil((durationFactor / 60) + (totalPotionSkillLevel / 500)) * 10;
+
Another example is the 50 XP potion, 5 level 45 skills only need 150 common and you get 50 xp, no rare required

Latest revision as of 06:38, 2 January 2014

Lets try to figure out how the XP earned works ... first we need to collect some data:

Amount of Buffs Level Buffs Time (mins) XP
1 150 30 10
1 150 60 20
1 150 120 30 (confirmed)
2 150 30 20
1 10 30 10
2 10 60 10 (retry please)
1 10 300 10
2 100 30 10
2 150 300 60
2 150 120 30 (confirmed)
1 60 60 20 (retry)

270mins, 270skill points = 60XP (retry)

possible formulas:

  • total buff level to calculate XP?
    • if below x always 10XP?
  • multiplied by duration factor?


As Hoof stated in the forums (http://forums.huntedcow.com/index.php?showtopic=58448&page=10#entry810636)

  • composingXPGained = ceil((durationFactor / 60) + (totalPotionSkillLevel / 500)) * 10


ojo1 understood it like this


That's correct, ojo1. The updated formula should look like this:

  • composingXPGained = ceil((min(durationFactor, totalPotionSkillLevel) / 60) + (totalPotionSkillLevel / 500)) * 10

--Majere 16:15 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Leveling with the least amount of commons

This is my first ever time controubiuting in any way to any form of wiki- If the forulma fo getting the optioum XP for the leaset amount of fragments were to be updated to use a base of 50 instead of a base of 40 it would save a lot of people a lot of fragments and be a little more accurate to it's name.

For example :A potition brewed with 4 level 50 skill and 1 level 68 skill for 160 common and 10 rare to get 60 XP The one on the guide proposes 4 level 40 and 1 level 108 for 126 common and 27 rare to get 60

Another example is the 50 XP potion, 5 level 45 skills only need 150 common and you get 50 xp, no rare required