Difference between revisions of "Spell Breaker"

From Fallen Sword Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Text replace - "http://72.29.91.222" to "http://huntedcow.cachefly.net/fs")
 
(One intermediate revision by one user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
__NOTOC__
+
{{Skill
{|cellpadding="5" width="100%"
+
|image={{SkillPicture|35}}
|width="50%" valign="top" align="left"|
+
|type=offense
==Description==
+
|level=300
{| cellpadding="0" cellspacing="0"
+
|description=+0.1% per point chance to remove a random buff from PvP target upon a successful attack.
| width="52" valign="top" | http://huntedcow.cachefly.net/fs/skills/35_b.gif
+
|stamina=35
|
+
|duration=45
'''Name:''' Spell Breaker<br />
+
}}
'''Level:''' 300<br />
+
'''Description:''' +0.1% per point chance to remove a random buff from PvP target upon a successful attack.<br />
+
'''Stamina:''' 35<br />
+
'''Duration:''' 45 Minutes<br />
+
'''Prerequisites:'''
+
* <nowiki>[none]</nowiki>
+
'''Max. Modifier:''' 25% with 250 points<br />
+
|}
+
|width="50%" valign="top" align="left"|
+
 
+
==Potions with this Skill==
+
* [[Breaker Potion]] : level 125, 20 minutes
+
* [[Potion of Nullifying Draft]] : level 250, 120 minutes
+
|}
+
 
+
 
==User Notes==
 
==User Notes==
FSNotice-The Spell Breaker skill will now ignore inactive skills. Note that the dynamic of it only working when you are the attacker is correct and not a bug.
+
FSNotice-The Spell Breaker skill will now ignore inactive skills. Note that the dynamic of it only working when you are the attacker is correct and not a bug. --[[Sercra]]
 
+
{{Skill Categories}}
+
[[Category:Skills]][[Category:Offense Skills]]
+

Latest revision as of 04:18, 12 November 2021

Description

35.png

Name: Spell Breaker
Skill Type: Offense
Level: 300
Description: +0.1% per point chance to remove a random buff from PvP target upon a successful attack.
Stamina: 35
Duration: 45 Minutes

User Notes

FSNotice-The Spell Breaker skill will now ignore inactive skills. Note that the dynamic of it only working when you are the attacker is correct and not a bug. --Sercra