Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fan/Guild Websites"
From Fallen Sword Wiki
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
since we're linking to external content, no. If we had internal content, yes a category page would be best. | since we're linking to external content, no. If we had internal content, yes a category page would be best. | ||
| − | I built the template, and applied it to my guild now. Later tonight I'll apply to all others on the page | + | I built the template, and applied it to my guild now (Bengals). Later tonight I'll apply to all others on the page |
--[[User:Eledill|Eledill]] 10:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | --[[User:Eledill|Eledill]] 10:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 10:22, 27 February 2008
Layout Discussion
To be fair to all guild/fan websites in terms of visibility, should we get consensus on formatting? For example, no all-caps (unless guild name appears that way in-game), no bold text, limits to use of colours etc. What do people think? --Ladhra 22:21, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- I agree we should have a consistent format.... I could make a template to have everyone conform to the same standard of formatting. --Eledill 02:28, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Cheers for the positive response. I take the lack of opposition thus far as "silent agreement" to the idea =) I think if you went ahead with the template it'd be a great start to help bring about some order to the page layout. --Ladhra 10:00, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Just had a thought - should this be better handled as a "Category" page (ala the Guild page). I'm not too familiar with MediaWiki, maybe someone else can comment? --Ladhra 10:14, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
since we're linking to external content, no. If we had internal content, yes a category page would be best.
I built the template, and applied it to my guild now (Bengals). Later tonight I'll apply to all others on the page
--Eledill 10:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
