Difference between revisions of "User talk:Belgrave"
From Fallen Sword Wiki
(→pruning excess pages) |
|||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
== Pages Suggested for Deletion == | == Pages Suggested for Deletion == | ||
| − | I feel the [[Fan/Guild_Websites]] is redundant since #1 nothing links to it and #2 we have 2 pages, one for each topic. | + | <strike>I feel the [[Fan/Guild_Websites]] is redundant since #1 nothing links to it and #2 we have 2 pages, one for each topic. |
| − | I also started a [[Templates:fansite]] template just prior to the change to standardize the format of each link. If the page is deleted, the template is not needed [[User:Eledill|Eledill]] | + | I also started a [[Templates:fansite]] template just prior to the change to standardize the format of each link. If the page is deleted, the template is not needed [[User:Eledill|Eledill]]</strike><br>Dealt with. {{User:Belgrave/Sig}} |
Revision as of 23:56, 14 March 2008
Suggestion
Instead of deleting the contents of your talk page you should consider archiving it. For example: User talk:Belgrave/Archive 1
But it's not like I can't look at everything that's ever been written on your page anyway. :p Silverwand Chat 21:29, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- I don't see much point in keeping much on my talk page when it's things like "j00 r da wiki king!" If it's a decent discussion, I'll keep it around a bit longer. Of course, you're right... If anyone wants to see what was here, it's all in the page history. — Belgrave, Moderator / Sysop Talk Message PM
Pages Suggested for Deletion
I feel the Fan/Guild_Websites is redundant since #1 nothing links to it and #2 we have 2 pages, one for each topic.
I also started a Templates:fansite template just prior to the change to standardize the format of each link. If the page is deleted, the template is not needed Eledill
Dealt with. — Belgrave, Moderator / Sysop Talk Message PM
