Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Creature"
From Fallen Sword Wiki
(Scavenging Creatures) |
(→Scavenging Creatures) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The third may actually be the best option, since from what I can tell, we can never learn the stats for scavenging creatures.. only their image + drops. What do people think? | The third may actually be the best option, since from what I can tell, we can never learn the stats for scavenging creatures.. only their image + drops. What do people think? | ||
| − | + | --[[User:Isakus|Isakus]] 17:15, 21 July 2009 (BST) | |
| + | |||
| + | :<span style="background-color:#beb;">Ok, I took the liberty to create a new template [[Template:CaveCreature]] for this. --[[User:Isakus|Isakus]] 18:34, 27 July 2009 (BST)</span> | ||
Revision as of 17:34, 27 July 2009
Scavenging Creatures
There are some creatures which I think only exist in scavenging caves. How should we represent them in this template? For instance, look at Potion of the Slayer - the drop creature is obviously wrong, but before I fix it (remove scavenging) we should figure out a good representation in the creature template.
- Suggestion 1: just use the area and write Mystic Cave or Ancient Cave there. Pro's: no need to change template, Con's: We need to know which of the cave the creatures are found (I've no idea and I never scavenge)
- Suggestion 2: Add parameter 'scavenging' with 'yes/no' value and output that its a scavenging creature somewhere on the generated creature page. Pros: we can fix all broken creature links without knowing which cave they exist in. Con: need change in template + it might be useful to actually know which cave to look in.
- Suggestion 3: Create a completely new template for scavenging creatures.
The third may actually be the best option, since from what I can tell, we can never learn the stats for scavenging creatures.. only their image + drops. What do people think? --Isakus 17:15, 21 July 2009 (BST)
- Ok, I took the liberty to create a new template Template:CaveCreature for this. --Isakus 18:34, 27 July 2009 (BST)
