Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sortable List of Weapons"

Revision as of 10:18, 30 April 2010 (view source) Aurik16 (Talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 19:39, 30 April 2010 (view source) Aurik16 (Talk | contribs)
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Why aren't this sortable list pages divided, like the item images page for example? a page for lvl 1-99, one for 100-199 and so on? i think it would be better, considering the size of the actual page..		Why aren't this sortable list pages divided, like the item images page for example? a page for lvl 1-99, one for 100-199 and so on? i think it would be better, considering the size of the actual page..
	--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 15:03, 29 April 2010 (BST)		--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 15:03, 29 April 2010 (BST)
−	<br>Really now, no one reads this? If nobody will answer, i'll take it as a "Go Ahead" and start editing this myself :)	+	<br>Really now, no one reads this? If nobody will answer, i'll take it as a "Go Ahead" and start editing this myself :)<br>
	--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 11:18, 30 April 2010 (BST)		--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 11:18, 30 April 2010 (BST)
		+
		+	I suggest you look at how the Category:Bestiary page is made (i mean look at the code) and rather do something like that than split it into several pages. The only other thing I see doable is changing the size of a section, as in making it 100 rather than 20. {{User:Ando/Sig}} 13:25, 30 April 2010 (BST)
		+
		+	Studied the code of the Category:Bestiary page a little and understand it :) i can start working on it right away, but first i would like another editor to say what he thinks about the size of a section..
		+	--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 14:20, 30 April 2010 (BST)
		+
		+	I'll start working at the sections, with a size of 50 levels...I think it's the best choice<br>
		+	--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 20:22, 30 April 2010 (BST)
		+
		+	I'll finish the pages later..<br>
		+	--[[User:Aurik16|Aurik16]] 20:39, 30 April 2010 (BST)

---

Latest revision as of 19:39, 30 April 2010

Why aren't this sortable list pages divided, like the item images page for example? a page for lvl 1-99, one for 100-199 and so on? i think it would be better, considering the size of the actual page.. --Aurik16 15:03, 29 April 2010 (BST)
Really now, no one reads this? If nobody will answer, i'll take it as a "Go Ahead" and start editing this myself :)
--Aurik16 11:18, 30 April 2010 (BST)

I suggest you look at how the Category:Bestiary page is made (i mean look at the code) and rather do something like that than split it into several pages. The only other thing I see doable is changing the size of a section, as in making it 100 rather than 20. 13:25, 30 April 2010 (BST)

Studied the code of the Category:Bestiary page a little and understand it :) i can start working on it right away, but first i would like another editor to say what he thinks about the size of a section.. --Aurik16 14:20, 30 April 2010 (BST)

I'll start working at the sections, with a size of 50 levels...I think it's the best choice
--Aurik16 20:22, 30 April 2010 (BST)

I'll finish the pages later..
--Aurik16 20:39, 30 April 2010 (BST)